[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chick flick? (story vs emotion)
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: chick flick? (story vs emotion)
- From: Morbus Iff
- Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 16:44:31 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <001c01be6672$f243ff40$04000005@zeus>
- Reply-To: idrama (at sign removed to prevent spamming) flutterby (dot) com
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
>The world I am heading for probably wont run on todays machines even. I know
>this an area where Dan and I disagree and we'll just see what path we take.
>I am sad that it will this will limit the target audience at first but I
>feel we need to build the technology to a certain standard (whatever that
>may be) and let the hardware catch up :(
Myself, I'm in utter and complete disagreement with this. But that's ok -
because I have an idea of what you're trying to accomplish with the
nonverbal communication phrase, and I can understand the neccessity for a
better medium than what I have.
If you are creating a story, then logically, it would seem that you'd want
something which everyone can read, like verbal storytellers or books.
Interactive stories require a different medium, but we've still got that
annoying "verbal" portion of storytellers.
I'll digress for a momemt, and mention an idea I just had. A story changing
depending on who the narrator is? Campside tales, five people telling the
same story, different emotions, context, etc. Digression ove
------- <http://www.disobey.com/> ----------- ICQ: 2927491 ----
CALL ME: The Disobey News Network
FIND ME: <http://www.disobey.com/dnn/>
READ ME: News, information, and the latest from the very
culture that Disobey and it's readers belong too.
Updated daily. Except weekends. Yeah, weekends.
-05------------<\/>-------------- Disobey Section 01 of 10 ----