Flutterby™! : mother acquitted in piercing daughter

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

mother acquitted in piercing daughter

2007-10-26 13:00:08.718087+00 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

Jay sent this along with an "I think this is on your beat" note, but I'm not sure I can come up with anything other than "WTF?": Mother acquitted in case involving daughter's genitalia piercing, the mother did it "to make intercourse uncomfortable", and had previously shaved her daughter's head to make her less attractive. This is one where a few hundred words really isn't sufficient for me to even start thinking about this, the reaction of the jury indicates that the girl was painted in a pretty harsh light:

"Maybe it was not the best decision in the world," foreman Colin Kelly said afterward. "But the intent was to try to stop a girl who was completely out of control... Are you going to put every parent in jail for making a bad decision?"

but it seems like at the very least there are some risk issues here, and a lot of questions over the responsibilities and abilities of the parent that I just don't have answers to.

[ related topics: Children and growing up Sociology Law ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2007-10-26 18:39:06.734598+00 by: petronius

Considering that any adult can go into Tattoo Tammy's establishment and get anything pierced up to a Prince Albert, the intervention might be seen as perhaps extreme, but not beyond the pale. What intrigues me is that Tammy was convicted while the person paying for it was not. Of course, under that state's laws piercing of anything but the ears may be absolutely forbidden to under 18s, regardless of parental permission.

Actually, what she should have done was get that Prince Albert for the boyfriend.