Flutterby™! : If we can't pass a not guilty by

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

If we can't pass a not guilty by

2013-01-21 16:54:09.587461-08 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

If we can't pass a "not guilty by reason of dubstep" Constitutional amendment, can we at least work it into case law?

[ related topics: Interactive Drama Law Work, productivity and environment ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2013-01-21 18:27:25.128562-08 by: TheSHAD0W

Vaguely related: http://topekasnews.com/god-set...n-fire-for-crappy-dubstep-music/

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.

Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.