Flutterby™! (short)

Thursday May 7th, 2026

Roberts no longer gives a shit Dan Lyke / comment 0

We've gotten to the point where the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court no longer gives a shit that people know he's lying. Chief Justice John Roberts says Supreme Court is not political

His remarks to a conference of judges and lawyers from the 3rd U.S. Circuit in Pennsylvania came at a time of <span class="LinkEnhancement">low public confidence</span> in the court, and about a week after the court handed down a decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act.

Yes, automated browsing sucks Dan Lyke / comment 0

The Register: Using AI to click around on a website burns 45x as many tokens as just using APIs. Which is completely unsurprising, and clicking around is also less deterministic, and what the fuck are we doing in a world where we're loosing random things on web sites rather than having computers communicate in deterministic defined ways with computers?

Via

Wednesday May 6th, 2026

coreutils rewrite Dan Lyke / comment 0

@lcamtuf@infosec.exchange

The coreutils Rust rewrite story is pretty funny.

Coreutils are tools like rm, mv, mkdir, etc. Unlike binutils, this isn't a fertile ground for memory safety bugs. But, the rewrite was completed, and in the spirit of progress, Canonical decided to switch.

But do you know what coreutils are a fertile ground for? Race conditions around file creation, deletion, permission setting, and so on. The original code accounted for decades of hard-learned lessons in that space. The Rust rewrite did not:

https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2026/q2/332

PS. I'm not dunking on Rust. It's just that... starting over from scratch has its hidden costs.

Shenanigansology Dan Lyke / comment 0

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal proposes a new branch of philosophy: Shenanigansology

Parents afraid of vitamin K, children dying Dan Lyke / comment 0

ProPublica: Babies Are Bleeding to Death as Parents Reject a Vitamin K Shot Given at Birth

Via, and Via.

Candy ad Dan Lyke / comment 0

afreytes :noai: @afreytes@mastodon.gamedev.place

This is how you make me buy your candy bar in 2026 🤭 🤭 🤭

M. A. M. A. ✊ | Cadbury 5 Star India — Make A.I. Mediocre Again (YouTube ad)

AI laundering ffmpeg Dan Lyke / comment 0

David Gerard @davidgerard@circumstances.run

what's Mark Karpeles of the Mt. Gox bitcoin disaster up to these days? He's trying to AI-launder code from ffmpeg and got caught https://github.com/OxideAV/oxideav-magicyuv/issues/3

LPMs, LLMs, and the future of software Dan Lyke / comment 1

arclight @arclight@oldbytes.space

More and more I feel that software is something that's inflicted on me rather than something I create or control that serves me.

And the rest of the thread, but/and then Cassandrich @dalias@hachyderm.io

@arclight It sounds like the problem you're addressing is not "publicly distributing code" that might be dangerous, but the catastrophe of LPMs (language package managers) making unvetted code posted by any random author into something that's essentially part of the language's standard library.

with some more good points and, outside of that thread, Cassandrich @dalias@hachyderm.io

I call this a hot take because it's not really nuanced or accurate.

But the idea is that both LLM codegen and LPMs are systems for assembling a bunch of unvetted code of dubious provenance from sources you don't want to be aware of to rapidly get something that "kinda works".

LLM is just taking it to a much further and more malicious degree that's hostile to the authors of the code you're ingesting as well.

Chrome stealing your storage for "AI" Dan Lyke / comment 0

Bruce Lawson @brucelawson@vivaldi.net:

People have asked me if @Vivaldi parks this on your machine. No, we don’t, because this “A.I.” is short for “Annoyingly Invasive”. We know it’s your machine, and you’d rather use storage space for music from The Cruellest Months/ Cheeky Girls, or selfies with your pet triceratops. Of course, you can visit any AI site you want in Vivaldi, but we won’t build it into our browser. There are plenty of data hoovers dressed up as browsers for that.

The Verge: Chrome's AI features may be hogging 4GB of your computer storage

Yahoo Tech: Google Chrome Silently Installs a 4 GB AI Model On You Device – Without Your Consent (Via)

Tom's Hardware: Google Chrome 'silently' downloads 4GB AI model to your device without permission, report claims — researcher says practice may violate EU law, waste thousands of kilowatts of energy News (Via)

That Privacy Guy: Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent. At a billion-device scale the climate costs are insane. (Via).

This week I discovered the same pattern, executed by Google. Google Chrome is reaching into users' machines and writing a 4 GB on-device AI model file to disk without asking. The file is named weights.bin. It lives in OptGuideOnDeviceModel. It is the weights for Gemini Nano, Google's on-device LLM. Chrome did not ask. Chrome does not surface it. If the user deletes it, Chrome re- downloads it.

Retroactive inactivity Dan Lyke / comment 0

Russell Keith-Magee @freakboy3742@cloudisland.nz

Thank you Google. I understand that you want Android developers to be active in their Play accounts. I understand that you sent me several email warnings about this. I was, however, quite busy.

But yesterday, I was able to find time to log in to my account. There were warning banners telling me my account might be closed due to inactivity.

And I was able to upload a new version of my app.

...and 10 hours later, you cancelled my developer account. Seriously?


Flutterby&tm;! is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net. Last modified: Thu Mar 15 12:48:17 PST 2001