I can fix her relationships as a Dan Lyke / comment 0
"I can fix her" relationships as a service: OpenAI being warned against allowing X-rated chat as it may create a "sexy suicide coach".
Pivot to AI: OpenAI advisor: ‘adult mode’ risks becoming ‘sexy suicide coach’
few production decisions I disagree Dan Lyke / comment 0
A few production decisions I disagree with, I think an arrangement should leave a little space, and there are some interesting vocal decisions, but... Rick Astley's new single is totally listenable.
Ageless Linux Dan Lyke / comment 0
Software for humans of indeterminate age. We don't know how old you are. We don't want to know. We are legally required to ask. We won't.
Including The Ageless Device
A physical computing device designed to satisfy every element of the California Digital Age Assurance Act's regulatory scope while deliberately refusing to comply with its requirements. The device costs less than lunch and will be handed to children.
feels kinda fascinating Facebook ad Dan Lyke / comment 0
This feels kinda fascinating: Facebook ad for "Granola.ai" has a testimonial from Deedy, partner at Menlo Ventures: "Granola is one of the best made "AI" apps that I've used this year."
Is AI as a phrase becoming poisoned enough that it's getting quoted? https://www.facebook.com/perma...E7rHBHqBVb5mQl&id=61579723227585
Nippon Life v. OpenAI Dan Lyke / comment 0
Stanford Law School: Designed to Cross: Why Nippon Life v. OpenAI Is a Product Liability Case
Graciela Dela Torre settled a long-term disability claim with prejudice in January 2024. Feeling she had been misled by her attorney, she uploaded his correspondence to ChatGPT. The chatbot validated her distrust. She fired her lawyer, attempted to reopen the settled case, and filed dozens of motions that courts found served no legitimate legal purpose. In March 2026, Nippon Life Insurance Company of America sued OpenAI for $10.3 million.
Mark Dominus linked to the actual complaint.
Unfortunately, I don't think $10.3M is nearly enough, unless it opens up the floodgates against OpenAI's malfeasance.
be the elephant Dan Lyke / comment 0
heard "be the elephant you want to see in the room" earlier and gosh if that hasn't stuck with me
First dump of AI links of the morning Dan Lyke / comment 0
maxine 🇵🇸 @maxine@hachyderm.io
LLM users respect a chatbot more than potential contributors is the worst part of all this. Everyone was capable of writing basic docs all along. They just didn’t want to for a fellow human.
I don’t know what exactly is it when you treat people as things and things as people, but it sure is fucking gross.
Oh, hey, it turns out that removing all skill and turning your pipeline over to commodity generation that anyone who wants that kind of slop can do themselves might have consequences: Futurism": BuzzFeed Nearing Bankruptcy After Disastrous Turn Toward AI.
Now, three years after its AI pivot, the writing is on the wall. The company reported a net loss of $57.3 million in 2025 in an earnings report released on Thursday. In an official statement, the company glumly hinted at the possibility of going under sooner rather than later, writing that “there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
Add this to your morning's comics: The Joy Of Tech: Support Group for AI Chatbots. Fediverse link.
Ars Technica: Supply-chain attack using invisible code hits GitHub and other repositories. As David Gerard points out it's kind of a rehash of the old (March 2024) using Unicode tags for prompt injection.
This one almost needs its own post. AI changes how you think: Cornell Chronicle: AI assistants can sway writers’ attitudes, even when they’re watching for bias
“Previous misinformation research has shown that warning people before they’re exposed to misinformation, or debriefing them afterward, can provide ‘immunity’ against believing it,” said Sterling Williams-Ceci ’21, a doctoral candidate in information science. “So we were surprised because neither of those interventions actually reduced the extent to which people’s attitudes shifted toward the AI’s bias in this context.”
Science Advances: Biased AI writing assistants shift users’ attitudes on societal issues
In two large-scale preregistered experiments (N = 2582), we exposed participants writing about important societal issues to an AI writing assistant that provided biased autocomplete suggestions. When using the AI assistant, the attitudes participants expressed in a posttask survey converged toward the AI’s position. However, a majority of participants were unaware of the AI suggestions’ bias and their influence. Further, the influence of the AI writing assistant was stronger than the influence of similar suggestions presented as static text, showing that the influence is not fully explained by these suggestions, increasing accessibility of the biased information. Last, warning participants about assistants’ bias before or after exposure does not mitigate the attitude-shift effect.
It is fascinating watching singers try Dan Lyke / comment 0
It is fascinating watching singers try to transpose, and shift mode, instead.
Still an Emacs user Dan Lyke / comment 0
Still an Emacs user. Beware the IDEs.
I would happily trade some Midwest Dan Lyke / comment 0
I would happily trade some Midwest weather here in March.
(A screen capture of the National Weather Service forecast for Petaluma California, showing 85 (Fahrenheit ) today, 85 tomorrow, 88 Tuesday, and 87 Wednesday and Thursday.)
Just went to Katherine Rhinehart's talk Dan Lyke / comment 0
Just went to Katherine Rhinehart's talk on auto oriented Petaluma development, and I appreciate the historical interest, but I have trouble seeing those buildings as anything but a monument to lead pollution and the smell of unburned hydrocarbons.