Fascinating read on the politics of Christo's "Running Fence" installation in Sonoma County https://petalumahistorian.com/christos-trojan-horse/
mirrored (likely with paywall) at https://www.petalumanews.com/2...ing-fence-changed-sonoma-county/
Fascinating read on the politics of Dan Lyke / comment 0
Fascinating read on the politics of Christo's "Running Fence" installation in Sonoma County https://petalumahistorian.com/christos-trojan-horse/
mirrored (likely with paywall) at https://www.petalumanews.com/2...ing-fence-changed-sonoma-county/
Fits on a Floppy Dan Lyke / comment 1
Fits on a Floppy, an awareness campaign with logo for small software.
Software should be as small as it can be. Not as a gimmick, but as a discipline. The floppy disk is the measuring stick: 1.44 MB. If the software that ran entire businesses could fit in that space, then a modern, focused, single-purpose tool certainly can.
Via.
Yeah, Telegram is readable by the FSB Dan Lyke / comment 0
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 @rysiek@mstdn.social
Independent audit confirms my analysis of Telegram's protocol from last year: https://istories.media/en/stor...endent-review-confirms-critical- telegram-vulnerability/
The audit was ordered by one of the main characters of IStories' investigation into Telegram's network infrastructure, man called Vedeneev. My analysis was done in connection with that journalistic investigation.
Presumably, Vedeneev ordered the audit in order to discredit my analysis and Istories' investigation. Instead, the report confirms my findings.
and Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 @rysiek@mstdn.social
You can find my original analysis here:
https://rys.io/en/179.htmltl;dr: for every device, Telegram generates a long-term identifier, auth_key_id, that is then prepended *cleartext* (or at best, trivially obfuscated) to every encrypted packet; this allows anyone with sufficient visibility into global Telegram traffic to spy on its users.
Mac Barnett & Jon Scieszka Dan Lyke / comment 0
Yesterday afternoon we went down to Copperfield's to see Mac Barnett in conversation with Jon Scieszka about Mac's new book Make Believe: On Telling Stories To Children. Two funny people talking very thoughtfully about relating to children. If you have the opportunity to hear 'em talk, do.
Casimir force Dan Lyke / comment 0
Love me a good takedown of.... investments of dubious quality, especially since I ran into the "EM thruster" stuff back when I was doing the transporation consulting: Ars Technica: Casimir force co-opted to generate free energy, midichlorians not included
This week, a company called Casimir Inc. emerged from stealth mode to announce that it had raised significant funding from venture capitalists willing to roll the dice on free energy. Thats right: a startup has gotten serious backing to develop sources of perpetual free energy. The people behind this fantastic new energy generator also brought us the wildly successful
WTF thrusterEM-drive that could supposedly directly convert electricity into a propulsive force.
LLM security disclosures making secrecy unmanageable Dan Lyke / comment 0
Essentially, "AI" discovered bugs/security holes are public, and should be treated as such, rather than being managed in privileged spaces without disclosure.
locking kids in boxes Dan Lyke / comment 0
Over the years I've read with horror the various things that state schools have done to native and indigenous children and families, but often assuaged that sense with the notion that this was all in the past, or in Canada, historical harms, and surely we were more civilized now...
NPR: Native kids with disabilities were held in wooden boxes. Sweeping reforms are coming
FORT COVINGTON, N.Y. Rumors spread on social media over the winter: School kids with disabilities in the Salmon River Central School District, including Akwesasne Mohawk children, were being confined by special education teachers in wooden boxes. Sarah Konwahahawi Herne was devastated.
arXive clamps down on slop papers Dan Lyke / comment 0
Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate plausible but false information across a wide range of contexts, yet the real-world magnitude and consequences of this hallucination problem remain poorly understood. Here we leverage a uniquely verifiable object - scientific citations - to audit 111 million references across 2.5 million papers in arXiv, bioRxiv, SSRN, and PubMed Central. We find a sharp rise in non- existent references following widespread LLM adoption, with a conservative estimate of 146,932 hallucinated citations in 2025 alone. These errors are diffusely embedded across many papers but especially pronounced in fields with rapid AI uptake, in manuscripts with linguistic signatures of AI-assisted writing, and among small and early-career author teams. At the same time, hallucinated references disproportionately assign credit to already prominent and male scholars, suggesting that LLM-generated errors may reinforce existing inequities in scientific recognition. Preprint moderation and journal publication processes capture only a fraction of these errors, suggesting that the spread of hallucinated content has outpaced existing safeguards. Together, these findings demonstrate that LLM hallucinations are infiltrating knowledge production at scale, threatening both the reliability and equity of future scientific discovery as human and AI systems draw on the existing literature.
Which brings us to: Fuck yeah! Tech Crunch: Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work.
404 Media: ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop
One of the amazing things about this is the number of people who are whining that it's unfair that they've actually read the work they're citing, or are creating other hypotheticals. This doofucs on the Fediverse is, for instance, willing to lay the blame on his co-authors in order to take the credit.
It gets worse if you head over to X/Twitter, which... I'm not gonna link to individually, you can find your own list off of Thomas G. Dietterich @tdietterich's announcement of the policy there, but honestly, people if these are the arguments y'all are making in good faith, academia is irretrievably broken.
Which I've long contented anyway, but... damn...