Flutterby™! : Need to shower

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Need to shower

2007-06-16 18:20:35.299806+00 by Dan Lyke 2 comments

I feel so dirty. I've just written my first C++ code that depends upon member object instantiation order.

[ related topics: Software Engineering ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2007-06-16 20:40:59.797692+00 by: ziffle

Wash your hands? But all code depends upon that up to a point.

#Comment Re: made: 2007-06-16 23:03:26.900138+00 by: Dan Lyke

Yeah, but usually it's much more explicit than this. Although I do believe it's the right thing to do in this case, it's kind of like depending on the fact that I know << versus + operator precedence (Ya know, I actually no longer have a copy of K&R, but I think it was page 73...), even though other programmers may be unsure of it.

(Yes, I am getting old [grin])