Body Hacking
2007-07-25 20:21:54.632875+02 by
Dan Lyke
1 comments
QOTD, Mark Atwood on body hacking:
Body hacking sounds like a neat idea. But I would really like to
have revision control.
Meuon and I used to muse about a DB-9 jack in the back of our necks, that became an ethernet jack, and that, of course, brought up the question of what the upgrade path looked like...
[ related topics:
Quotes Databases
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2007-07-25 20:35:37.002953+02 by:
ebwolf
You actually have redundant array of optical interfaces on the front of your head. This array is capable of dropping the redundancy to extract additional information (depth).
The bandwidth of this interface is pretty high. Unfortunately, the protocol normally used to convey information across it (written text). Graphic imagery is more efficient (1000x - one picture = one kiloword) but the indexing routines in the brain don't necessarily operate the same way from system to system (beauty is in the eye of the beholder).
Probably the greatest inefficiency of this interface is in the latency. Typing, speech and handwriting recognition are all much slower (it's taken me about three minutes to write this small amount of text - where as it only took a couple seconds for me to read the post and think of this idea).
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.