Aaron's Georgia Voting Rant
2009-10-18 13:24:13.603134+02 by
meuon
2 comments
On the ALE List, Aaron is a well respected zealot. Especially about electronic voting systems. It's a long rant, well summarized in one quote:
"In essence, the judges of the Georgia Supreme court
have now ruled that no Georgia citizen can challenge
the legality and constitutionality of a voting system
that produces no evidence and provides no accountability
because the voting system produces no evidence and
provides no accountability which would show just cause
for a legal challenge."
More issues on VoteGA.org,
many other states have similiar issues.
It's a real problem if we are to maintain the perception that we are a representative democracy. I can think of low-tech (back to paper ballots), extra step ("vote" again with an outside auditing agency[do you remember who you voted for dog catcher?]), and high tech (digital keys) solutions with printed receipts (hmm,. paper again, eh?). But none really work better than counting chad laden paper ballots or electronically scanned paper ballots.
[ related topics:
Interactive Drama Law Work, productivity and environment Dogs
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2009-10-18 14:34:41.849017+02 by:
m
Representative Democracy in the US has been destroyed by Stalinesque voting.
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
Those who count the votes decide everything."
Josef Stalin
Georgia was the last hold out against programmable and electronic voting machines. But it is not only computerized voting machines that are the problem. Internet voting and mail in ballots, which most if not all states are pursuing, are completing the rout.
#Comment Re: made: 2009-10-20 18:35:44.038425+02 by:
m
The German equivalent of the US Supreme Court has declared that Electronic Voting is unconstitutional. For the reason that such voting is unreliable, and not subject to viable auditing.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.