Flutterby™! : Bypassing higher ed

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Bypassing higher ed

2010-09-11 00:05:04.119226+02 by Dan Lyke 4 comments

Washington Post: Some say bypassing a higher education is smarter than paying for a degree.

"There's a billion other things you could do with your money," Altucher says. One option: Invest the money you'd spend on tuition in Treasury bills for your child's retirement. According to Altucher, $200,000 earning 5 percent a year over 50 years would amount to $2.8 million.

(Via Crasch.) It's mainstream media, so of course they don't have any statistics, just anecdotes, but...

[ related topics: Journalism and Media Education Economics ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2010-09-11 01:24:15.435226+02 by: spc476

And $2.8m will be worth what in 50 years? 50 years ago, $200,000 in 1960 dollars may be worth between $1.1m and $5.4m in 2009 dollars (depending on how you calculate inflation).

On the other hand, $200,000 worth of gold in 1960 would be worth a bit over $7m today (silver on the other hand, would be worth $4.4m today).

#Comment Re: made: 2010-09-12 05:38:06.263226+02 by: ebwolf

Overall, it's a darned good article. It also starts to address the situation where your parents maybe saved $10K-$20K. Best investment: travel, start a business... not college.

I just wrote a long email to my daughter describing why having $20K in the bank when you start college is a bad idea. All it really does is reduce your ability to get scholarships and financial aid. Smarter move: blow the wad of cash on travel, wait until you are emancipated from your parents, go to a reasonably priced school for a professional degree. Assuming, of course, the business doesn't work out.

#Comment Re: made: 2010-09-12 13:07:14.571226+02 by: Dan Lyke

Sean, I think you mean it the other way around: if modern-day $1.1m-$5.4m is worth $200k in 1960 dollars, if historical trends hold that $2.8 million in today's dollars could be worth $400k or $80k in 50 years. So, yeah, the key is 5% after inflation.

But if, as we've posited before, college works as a relatively noisy high-pass filter, then the question is: what's a reasonable career path? How long are cushy government jobs with big pensions going to be the rage, or are you better off taking a more entrepreneurial approach?

A lot of this depends on personality, but I think we're finding more and more that if you have the drive and intelligence, then college is a detriment.

#Comment Re: made: 2010-09-13 00:44:50.475226+02 by: Dan Lyke

On the money, Philip Greenspun has some observations.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.