Shrinking brains
2011-01-02 19:57:34.21382+01 by Dan Lyke 4 comments
2011-01-02 19:57:34.21382+01 by Dan Lyke 4 comments
[ related topics: History ]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2011-01-03 13:37:04.265204+01 by: meuon
As humans have also become much larger, that pure volumetric analysis stands out.
I wonder what the "density" relationship would be. A denser cluster of neurons might be more efficient. Of course, my assumption
is that we are getting smarter. Laughing.
#Comment Re: made: 2011-01-03 16:53:34.833447+01 by: Larry Burton
2,000 years ago humans probably had to be smarter. As we developed technology to make life simpler we made the requirements for survival less demanding and, as a result, the intelligence level needed to survive was lowered. In fact, I can see where our dependence on society for survival may require us to be dumber.
#Comment Re: made: 2011-01-03 17:08:57.307594+01 by: andylyke
I wonder how much of that shrinkage has occurred since Rupert bought Fox. Just kidding, folks
#Comment Re: made: 2011-01-03 17:52:45.253022+01 by: Dan Lyke
Dad, I was gonna make that crack, but even Mort Kondracke hasn't been around for enough of that 20,000 years to be statistically significant...
(And, yes, I really did just go looking for the oldest Fox commentator. I feel soooo dirty.)
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.