Flutterby™! : Why don't we charge reckless endangerment without alcohol?

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Why don't we charge reckless endangerment without alcohol?

2015-05-19 18:35:08.505078+00 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Officials Send Strong Message to Motorists: 'Don't be Drunk When You Drive Like a Drunk':

San Francisco makes certain their reckless drivers are sober. Evidence supported that Muzaffar was completely sober when he was checking his phone and making a fast right turn in his SUV, failing to yield to 3 people, killing 1 and seriously injuring the others. Investigators found there was no cause for charging Muzaffar with gross negligence as a felony, because he wasn't intoxicated. So the lesson is clear, don't be drunk when you behave drunk or you'll pay dearly.

[ related topics: Humor Bay Area California Culture ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):