Flutterby™! : People who say that interpreted

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

People who say that interpreted

2015-07-28 19:55:02.740005+00 by Dan Lyke 4 comments

People who say that interpreted languages are just as safe as compiled language with proper test coverage need to check their premises...

[ related topics: Bay Area Journalism and Media ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: People who say that interpreted made: 2015-07-29 22:32:52.252773+00 by: TheSHAD0W

[citation needed]

#Comment Re: People who say that interpreted made: 2015-07-29 22:52:13.789193+00 by: Dan Lyke

that "with proper test coverage" bit... I've never seen it. That's where the citation's needed.

(Especially not with existing code. Holy fuck this is one gawdawful mess.)

#Comment Re: People who say that interpreted made: 2015-08-02 12:41:03.946394+00 by: TheSHAD0W

With or without proper test coverage. Why are interpreted languages less safe than compiled ones?

#Comment Re: People who say that interpreted made: 2015-08-03 00:50:02.811597+00 by: Dan Lyke

So the main things I'm seeing are: