2015-09-05 04:00:04.156379+02 by Dan Lyke 1 comments
I'd be even more for this proposal if we could start abandoning non-productive infrastructure as well! http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/...ace-a-new-65-highway-6483821.php
[ related topics: Interactive Drama Invention and Design Work, productivity and environment California Culture ]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: I'd be even more for this proposal if made: 2015-09-05 20:05:23.412875+02 by: dexev
City council here in Portland tried something similar last year: a yearly fee per household and a business tax to raise money for roads. They got their...hats?...handed to them, hard and by everyone. Seems like lots of folks want roads, but only if they don't have to pay for them.
Adventures in text-mode browsing: 22 pages of links and image captions before getting to the article text. Thanks sfgate!
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.