Flutterby™! : "Affair" == "abuse" ?

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

"Affair" == "abuse" ?

2002-06-12 20:30:14+02 by Shawn 4 comments

Is it another case of the politically correct "me-too" victim, or just [extremely] poor reporting? I can't tell. This article at the NYPost simply states that a woman has come forward to say that Bishop James McCarthy had an on-again, off-again "sexual relationship" (elsewhere in the article, referred to as an "affair") with her, starting when she was about 21. And that she knows that he had "relationships" with other women. The accuser says:

I was appalled at the thought that the bishop who abused me was going to Dallas to help make a policy about sexual abuse,

(Emphasis mine.)

[ related topics: Sexual Culture Political Correctness Law Current Events Journalism and Media ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment made: 2002-06-12 21:05:54+02 by: Larry Burton

This started when she was 21 and she is calling it abuse? This was either rape or consensual sex. I don't understand how she could term it as abuse if it was consensual.

#Comment made: 2002-06-12 23:04:36+02 by: anser

If she was a parishioner who came to McCarthy for pastoral reasons and ended up having sex with him, then it is abuse, just not child abuse. If she was the cleaning woman, it was an unauthorized export of Vatican practices...

#Comment made: 2002-06-12 23:50:17+02 by: Shawn

If she was a parishioner who came to McCarthy for pastoral reasons and ended up having sex with him, then it is abuse

Only if he used his position/influence to coerce/convince her to do so. But the story reported makes absolutely any indication that this might even be the case. I'm not saying it's not possible, just that I'm confused. The information we've been provided doesn't add up.

#Comment made: 2002-06-13 02:43:18+02 by: meuon [edit history]

Anything + Media = Scandal

Scandal = News

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.