Flutterby™! : Raymond on SCO

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Raymond on SCO

2003-08-27 20:47:29.891449+02 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

Charlene's venture has had her delving into law and talking to IP lawyers recently. And it's been slightly confusing, she's been getting different answers from different people, making it clear that, yes, "the law" is some sort of group hallucination, and frankly some of those interpreting it are on some wacky shit. While Charlene is struggling over the fine points of trademarks versus service marks versus registered trademarks, Abercrombie & Fitch is claiming trademark status on "22", despite the fact that they've never registered it. Based on what little I know, I can't imagine that that'll hold up, but.... yeah...

So while we're talking about lawyers on crack, Eric Raymond examines the details of the SCO complaint against IBM.

[ related topics: Intellectual Property Open Source Copyright/Trademark ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: Raymond on SCO made: 2003-08-27 21:39:07.247806+02 by: ziffle

Seven ! there -- I used it and so I own it - 7!

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.