Flutterby™! : fine for unprotected sex

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

fine for unprotected sex

2004-09-17 18:19:06.409233+00 by Dan Lyke 2 comments

Two california porn companies fined for allowing unprotected sex on a movie set:

Susan Gard, agency spokeswoman, said the companies violated California law when actors performed sex scenes without using condoms. She said state law requires employers to protect workers who are exposed to blood or bodily fluids on the job.

"Any bodily fluid is considered infectious," she said. "That means barrier equipment must be used."

[ related topics: Sexual Culture Movies Current Events Work, productivity and environment California Culture ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2004-09-18 21:28:47.274408+00 by: Dan Lyke

So I re-read that quote, and wondered if we're going to see barriers the next time there's the potential for exchange of saliva in a TV show...

#Comment Re: made: 2004-09-20 14:36:25.891889+00 by: meuon [edit history]

Laughing.. all of a sudden, I see more latex fetishware showing up on soap opera's and movies...