Flutterby™! : aiding and abetting

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

aiding and abetting

2005-08-23 17:54:31.249422+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

I know, I promised the next entry would be upbeat, but it didn't work out that way.

I've whined before about hotel reservations search engine spammers. Phil Ringnalda points out that O'Reilly is aiding and abetting them, and in the comments to that entry, Shelley says that she's making her car payments that way. I've got mixed feelings about this, I've considered taking some advertising here and leveraging this domain's search engine placement, on the other hand I've tried to plan a vacation around these search engine spammers and double dealers, and it's a royal pain in the ass.

So at the very least I'll be running through and adding rel="nofollow" to all O'Reilly links on Flutterby, and I'd strongly suggest anyone else with a website start thinking about ways that we can leverage our own ranking to make the commons a better place.

[ related topics: Web development Weblogs Ethics Spam Consumerism and advertising Travel Net Culture ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.