Flutterby™! : Bad ideas run amok

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Bad ideas run amok

2006-11-08 01:41:32.445637+01 by meuon 2 comments

PNRP (Peer Name Resolution Protocol) is one of those ideas that sounds simple and innocuous enough. It even sounds like it has 'secure names', obviously a buzzword compliant marketing term to sell value added services of 'secure names' outside the DNS/Domain hierarchy. Two things make it sound like an idea that only sounds good after a case of liquor and some good drugs.. You know: that point when concepts like 'Light bulbs are dark-suckers, not light emitters' are really really deep thoughts.

Multiple entities can publish the same peer-name

PNRP does not use a routing table, but rather a cache of PNRP entries. New cache entries are acquired as a side effect of ongoing traffic. The cache maintenance algorithm ensures that each node maintains adequate knowledge of the "cloud". It is designed to ensure that the time to resolve a request varies as the logarithm of the size of the cloud.

As I start imagining scenarios for stupidity, spoofing and malice, my head explodes.

[ related topics: Drugs Health Invention and Design Law Consumerism and advertising Marketing ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2006-11-08 03:46:34.549772+01 by: Mars Saxman

Sure, but stupidity, spoofing, and malice are endemic to the network. We already have plenty of that with the centralized domain registration system. At least a distributed system can't be hijacked for corporate/ political reasons (see Network Solutions).

#Comment Re: made: 2006-11-09 14:10:43.435637+01 by: meuon [edit history]

and now, M$- Can make them 'real domains' for a nominal fee: 2006-10-31, M$ is ICANN Accredited

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.