Flutterby™! : FCC vs Comcast, and we lose

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

FCC vs Comcast, and we lose

2007-09-25 17:05:10.802595+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

The FCC is "proposing" a $4k fine against Comcast for a "fake news" segment:

According to the FCC filing, on Sept. 21, 2006, CN8, a Comcast-affiliated network, aired portions of a video news release on behalf of "Nelson's Rescue Sleep," a natural sleep-aid product, without saying who paid for the spot.

This is interesting for a couple of reasons, the FCC hasn't historically had control over the content of cable television, so there's some legal question here, but it's also a very interesting (and scary) step down a slippery slope: how many trade magazines would go out of business if they weren't pimping the products of advertising? Hell, what does that mean when the New York Times is pimping WMD stories from the administration in exchange for access?

Seems like there are a bunch of scary-ass questions about federal power that this raises if it goes through.

[ related topics: Technology and Culture Law Current Events Consumerism and advertising Journalism and Media Television Civil Liberties ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.