Flutterby™! : Further evidence of theft

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Further evidence of theft

2008-09-22 18:06:32.367601+02 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

W00t! Here's a doozy from a Wall Street Journal article on the Wall Street giveaway:

Mr. Paulson is resisting efforts to limit the pay of executives whose firms participate in the program and plans to fight it "hard," according to a person familiar with the matter. He fears that provision would render the program moot, since many firms might choose not to participate.

You mean if rewards are tied to performance then those involved might actually choose to fix things rather than suck off the welfare nipple? Gosh!

[ related topics: Politics moron Economics ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2008-09-22 19:28:36.409789+02 by: m

One would also have to suspect that if the firms were not willing to limit executive pay, they really have no need of being bailed out.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.