art vs child porn
2009-11-05 16:36:48.529567+01 by
Dan Lyke
1 comments
Fantastic essay by Laura Cumming in the Guardian exploring the difference between art and child porn:
Not far from the strip joints of Soho is an image of a child having sex with an adult that can be seen for nothing any day of the week. The child is a boy of about 10 or 11, completely naked, his backside raised and partially turned to the viewer. The adult is a young woman, also naked. She is slipping her tongue into his mouth; he is squeezing her right nipple between his fingers. Not only is the boy clearly underage, but this sexual abuse of a minor turns out to be incestuous, too the woman is actually his mother.
Via Eros log
[ related topics:
Sexual Culture Sociology Art & Culture
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2009-11-05 18:36:32.254751+01 by:
m
For those who have not heard it yet:
My doxy is orthodoxy. Your doxy is heterodoxy.
Comment policy
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.