Flutterby™! : art vs child porn

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

art vs child porn

2009-11-05 16:36:48.529567+01 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

Fantastic essay by Laura Cumming in the Guardian exploring the difference between art and child porn:

Not far from the strip joints of Soho is an image of a child having sex with an adult that can be seen for nothing any day of the week. The child is a boy of about 10 or 11, completely naked, his backside raised and partially turned to the viewer. The adult is a young woman, also naked. She is slipping her tongue into his mouth; he is squeezing her right nipple between his fingers. Not only is the boy clearly underage, but this sexual abuse of a minor turns out to be incestuous, too – the woman is actually his mother.

Via Eros log

[ related topics: Sexual Culture Sociology Art & Culture ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2009-11-05 18:36:32.254751+01 by: m

For those who have not heard it yet:

My doxy is orthodoxy. Your doxy is heterodoxy.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.