Flutterby™! : Oracle vs Google patent lawsuit

Oracle vs Google patent lawsuit

2010-08-13 22:57:57.787226+02 by Dan Lyke 2 comments

Miguel de Icaza: Initial Thoughts on Oracle vs Google Patent Lawsuit. Very interesting read on software patents, licensing, and how this relates to the Microsoft Community Promise.

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2010-08-14 12:03:26.055226+02 by: meuon

My sad insight is, computer languages and general technology used to be based on a "Darwinian" approach. Languages evolved as they became better for a purpose, not because they avoided other languages thought processes. Things became better because it was a better design, better execution of a design, better production efficiencies and quality of a design.

It seems we can not take the straight direct logical or natural path from point A to point B. We must zig-zag through a minefield, wary of snipers.

#Comment Re: made: 2010-08-16 17:28:34.359226+02 by: m

One wag on Groklaw wanted to know "if Oracle had recently hired Daryl McBride."

I got hooked into following the SCO case for perhaps seven years. One of those slow motion crashes that I just couldn't take my eyes off. I don't know much more about IP law now than I did then, except that I am far from being alone in my lack of understanding. And that if you do understand IP, quantum entanglement across galaxies will be a piece of cake.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.

Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke

for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.