Flutterby™! : Supreme Court GPS tracking decision

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Supreme Court GPS tracking decision

2012-01-23 18:04:20.460933+01 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

Whoah: 9 out of 9 U.S. Supreme Court Justices have decided that police need a warrant to plant a GPS tracking device on your car.

[ related topics: Privacy Law Enforcement Automobiles Maps and Mapping ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2012-01-23 19:31:21.184594+01 by: Mars Saxman

I'm astonished. I had fully expected them to weasel out of it somehow, and on we'd go toward more surveillance. This is good news.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.

Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.