Flutterby™! : NSL unconstitutional

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

NSL unconstitutional

2013-03-15 23:12:28.31902+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Hell yes: EFF publishes the ruling which makes National Security Letters unconstitutional.

Pursuant to the National Security Letter Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2709, the FBI issued a National Security Letter ("NSL") to Petitioner, an electronic communciations service provider ("ECSP"), seeking "subscriber information." By certifying, under section 2709(c)(1), that disclosure of the existence of the NSL may result in "a danger to the national security of the United States, interference with a criminal, counterterrorism, or counterintelligence investigation, interference with diplomatic relations, or danger to the life or physical safety of any person," the FBI was able to prohibit Petituioner from disclosing the existence of the NSL. Petitioner filed a Petition to Set Aside the National Security Letter and Nondisclosure Requirement, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3511(a) and (b).

But judgement is stayed for appeal to the Ninth Circuit. We generally like the Ninth Circuit.

[ related topics: Free Speech Law Enforcement ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.