Flutterby™! : On data caps

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

On data caps

2013-12-20 18:53:58.755301+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Cable Industry Finally Admits Caps Not About Congestion, After Insisting For Years Caps Were About Congestion quotes NCTA's Powell: Usage-Based Pricing About Fairness, Not Capacity: Says principal purpose is to monetize high fixed costs.

But he pointed out that the cable industry had to spend a bunch of money on its network before the first customer was signed. So, for a business that requires "enormously high" fixed costs -- digging up the streets, put the wires in -- and operational expense, "it is a completely rational and acceptable process to figure out how to fairly allocate those costs among your consumers who are choosing the service and will pay you to recover those costs."

In other words, they're trying to create an externality to subsidize low usage customers.

We need to find ways to break the communications duopoly.

[ related topics: Quotes broadband Current Events Consumerism and advertising Currency ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.