Flutterby™! : False positives and police dogs

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

False positives and police dogs

2013-12-22 16:49:08.880386+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Las Vegas Review-Journal: Legal challenge questions reliability of police dogs, reports on a lawsuit in Nevada over a U.C. Davis study testing the false positive rates of drugs and explosives sniffing in police dogs, in which a run without any samples was tested:

But of 144 runs, that happened only 21 times, for a failure rate of 85 percent.

Although drug-sniffing dogs are supposed to find drugs on their own, the researchers concluded that they were influenced by their handlers, and that's what led to such a high failure rate.

[ related topics: Drugs Health Law Current Events Law Enforcement Gambling Dogs ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.