Flutterby™! : counterfactual thinking

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

counterfactual thinking

2014-02-10 15:28:54.415792+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Rafe has some musings on how to write about security, but I think there's also a larger message here that needs some spreading about journalism generally. If the New York Times is just blindly repeating sources without applying any critical thinking, and they are, then they're just echoing the already loudest voices.

And we've long established that popularity occurs for reasons of social structure that probably aren't things I want to be supporting.

[ related topics: Interactive Drama Invention and Design Journalism and Media New York ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.