Flutterby™! : Against early cancer detection

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Against early cancer detection

2015-03-02 18:00:39.778723+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

The Case Against Cancer Early Detection:

Early detection might remain a laudable goal if it caught some deadly cancers in time to make a difference and didn’t bother anyone. But it is bothering people. Tens of thousands of South Koreans have undergone surgical procedures for cancers that likely would never have threatened their lives, and the overdiagnosis/overtreatment problem exists to varying degrees for every cancer test.

Interesting that we don't have good diagnoses for distinguishing the "rabbits" from the "turtles", the fast growing cancers from the slow growing ones, and that as we're able to detect cancers earlier, we're discovering that many cancers don't persist, or are effectively removed by the natural processes of the body (JAMA Internal Medicine: The Natural History of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Mammography)

[ related topics: Interactive Drama Law ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.