2016-05-12 01:04:08.751801+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments
I'm not a fan of the rule change about pedestrian ramps, but given that those are the rules, this is both an interesting use of open data and how the city responded to it.
Edit: <href="http://urbanresidue.blogspot.com/2014/06/legally-blocking- crosswalk.html">Urban Residue: Legally blocking the crosswalk? talks about the idiocy of the rule change
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.