housing economics
2018-08-14 01:55:22.898802+02 by
Dan Lyke
1 comments
We disagree with the Washington Post about housing economics
Monday’s Washington Post ran a provocative headline: “In expensive cities, rents fall for the rich–but rise for the poor.” Citing data from one of the nation’s most authoritative real estate analytics firms, Zillow, it claims not only that rents are falling for the rich while rising for the poor, but also implies that building new apartments (chiefly at the high end) hasn’t done anything to help affordability.
Other thing to note is that the income split used for these categories is for renters alone, so "high income" still means relatively low income compared to your median homeowner.
[ related topics:
Invention and Design Economics Real Estate
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: housing economics made: 2018-08-16 01:58:39.181984+02 by:
TheSHAD0W
I'm thinking it may also mean flight from big cities, now that so many non-manufacturing jobs can be done from home.
Comment policy
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.