Flutterby™! : Schools are not for learning

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Schools are not for learning

2019-02-25 05:12:27.647959+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Peter Gray in Psychology Today: Schools Are Good for Showing Off, Not for Learning:

For example, in one research study, conducted many years ago, psychologists observed people playing friendly games of 8-ball at the university’s pool hall.[1] At first they watched from a distance, so the players wouldn’t know they were being observed, and then they moved in close and observed deliberately, making it obvious that they were evaluating performance. The result was that those who were already good, when not observed closely, performed even better when they knew they were being evaluated; but those who were just beginners, learning how to play, performed worse when evaluated. The same has been found for many kinds of tasks—intellectual as well as athletic or manual. Showing off is facilitated by evaluation and contests, but such pressures inhibit learning. And yet, in our constant attempt (supposedly) to increase learning at school, we keep raising the pressure, and then wonder why it doesn’t work.

And the ref is:

[1] Michaels, J. W., Blommel, J. M., Brocato, R. M., Linkous, R. A., & Rowe, J. S. (1982). Social facilitation and inhibition in a natural setting. Replications in Social Psychology, 2, 21–24.

[ related topics: Children and growing up Privacy Games Psychology, Psychiatry and Personality Weblogs Movies Theater & Plays Work, productivity and environment Civil Liberties Education Gambling Government ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):