Flutterby™!
: More skepticism on wine tasting
More skepticism on wine tasting
2019-06-12 00:28:52.883868+02 by
Dan Lyke
0 comments
Wine-tasting: it's junk science
Results from the first four years of the experiment, published in the Journal of Wine Economics, showed a typical judge's scores varied by plus
or minus four points over the three blind tastings. A wine deemed to be a good 90 would be rated as an
acceptable 86 by the same judge minutes later and then an excellent 94.
[ related topics:
Law Wines and Spirits Handicaps & Disabilities Economics
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
Comment policy
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.