Flutterby™! : Psychological Experiments

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Psychological Experiments

2020-12-07 18:21:49.679162+00 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Up-Front: Yes, this is a dig at the history of psychology as a discipline, but it's also praise that the discipline is learning and changing.

Charlene's doing some study on psychology, taking some classes, a lot of reading, and I mentioned something about how I thought the consensus in modern psychology was that reliving traumatic experiences was generally just reinforcing the negative impacts, and she said she'd like to find more, so I went and dug through a few papers, and...

You know, it's fairly easy to throw digs at medicine, to point out that up into the 1990s, except for trauma care, you were generally better off without medical intervention.

Evidence-based medicine is a relatively new invention, and has brought some amazing changes in understanding...

Well, yeah: A lot of the practices of psychology of the 1980s and 1990s have been, in the twenty-naughts and twenty teens, been found to probably have been actively harmful. I mean, forget the casual harms of the era of Freud and Jung preying on bored Vienna housewives, like seriously reinforcing the shit out of traumatic experiences in awful ways harmful. Sometimes it's amazing how long a discipline can go without someone calling bullshit.

So I posted this to Facebook, and it spawned some good discussion, and then this morning I see this come across my Twitter feed:

The Onion: Report: Majority Of Psychological Experiments Conducted In 1970s Just Crimes

[ related topics: Psychology, Psychiatry and Personality Invention and Design Food Community Education ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Add your own comment:

(If anyone ever actually uses Webmention/indie-action to post here, please email me)




Format with:

(You should probably use "Text" mode: URLs will be mostly recognized and linked, _underscore quoted_ text is looked up in a glossary, _underscore quoted_ (http://xyz.pdq) becomes a link, without the link in the parenthesis it becomes a <cite> tag. All <cite>ed text will point to the Flutterby knowledge base. Two enters (ie: a blank line) gets you a new paragraph, special treatment for paragraphs that are manually indented or start with "#" (as in "#include" or "#!/usr/bin/perl"), "/* " or ">" (as in a quoted message) or look like lists, or within a paragraph you can use a number of HTML tags:

p, img, br, hr, a, sub, sup, tt, i, b, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, cite, em, strong, code, samp, kbd, pre, blockquote, address, ol, dl, ul, dt, dd, li, dir, menu, table, tr, td, th

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.