Flutterby™! : Collusion within security management

Collusion within security management

2021-01-07 17:32:50.9167+00 by Dan Lyke 3 comments

Some among America's military allies believe Trump deliberately attempted a coup and may have had help from federal law-enforcement officials

The French police official said they believed that an investigation would find that someone interfered with the deployment of additional federal law-enforcement officials on the perimeter of the Capitol complex; the official has direct knowledge of the proper procedures for security of the facility.

Capitol Rioters Planned for Weeks in Plain Sight. The Police Weren’t Ready.

[ related topics: Law Enforcement ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: Collusion within security management made: 2021-01-07 22:45:10.761692+00 by: Dan Lyke

Maryland Governor Hogan details issues with deploying the guard:

Hogan said Maj. Gen. Timothy Gowen, the adjutant general of the Maryland National Guard, was repeatedly rebuffed by the head of the National Guard at the federal level.

Gowen “kept running it up the flagpole, and we don’t have authorization,” Hogan said. “We don’t have authorization.”

Yeah, looking more and more like a deliberate coup attempt at high levels.

#Comment Re: Collusion within security management made: 2021-01-07 23:39:06.257545+00 by: Dan Lyke

Capitol breach prompts urgent questions about security failures

#Comment Re: Collusion within security management made: 2021-01-08 00:10:59.139895+00 by: Dan Lyke

Justice Department warns of national security fallout from Capitol Hill insurrection

One current Metro D.C. police officer said in a public Facebook post that off-duty police officers and members of the military, who were among the rioters, flashed their badges and I.D. cards as they attempted to overrun the building. “If these people can storm the Capitol building with no regard to punishment, you have to wonder how much they abuse their powers when they put on their uniforms,” the officer wrote.

Add your own comment:

(If anyone ever actually uses Webmention/indie-action to post here, please email me)

Format with:

(You should probably use "Text" mode: URLs will be mostly recognized and linked, _underscore quoted_ text is looked up in a glossary, _underscore quoted_ (http://xyz.pdq) becomes a link, without the link in the parenthesis it becomes a <cite> tag. All <cite>ed text will point to the Flutterby knowledge base. Two enters (ie: a blank line) gets you a new paragraph, special treatment for paragraphs that are manually indented or start with "#" (as in "#include" or "#!/usr/bin/perl"), "/* " or ">" (as in a quoted message) or look like lists, or within a paragraph you can use a number of HTML tags:

p, img, br, hr, a, sub, sup, tt, i, b, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, cite, em, strong, code, samp, kbd, pre, blockquote, address, ol, dl, ul, dt, dd, li, dir, menu, table, tr, td, th

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.

Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke

for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.