Flutterby™! : Discrepancies and the Sonoma County Sheriff's Department

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Discrepancies and the Sonoma County Sheriff's Department

2021-02-03 19:28:07.827653+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

It's kinda funny how representatives of two different departments can investigate the same gathering and come up with completely different facts. It's interesting that one of those investigators was a County Sheriff's Deputy, and he came up with a completely different account, an order of magnitude fewer people, and a completely different venue, than the multiple officials from the county code enforcement staff. It's almost like the County Sheriff's Deputies are so used to lying, and not being called out on their lies, that they don't care that their accounts will be directly contradicted by numerous credible witnesses.

Sonoma County sheriff’s deputy investigated for discrepancies in report on church

Atallah reported arriving at Spring Hills Church at 10:12 a.m., near the end of its hourlong Sunday morning 9:30 a.m. service, according to the record. During a 17-minute visit, which he wrote included speaking with church staff and performing a walkthrough of the expansive church campus, he noted seeing no more than 15 people, all wearing masks during a “small outdoor church gathering.” Everyone on the property was complying with the public health order, Atallah reported, and church services were nearly finished for the day.

That account contradicted a report by county code enforcement staff, which documented 130 people, many of whom were not wearing masks, attending the same, primarily indoor service, according to Tennis Wick, director of the county’s permit department. ...

[ related topics: Religion Health Current Events ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.