Flutterby™! : You are not a parrot

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

You are not a parrot

2023-03-01 23:47:25.472286+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

New York Magazine: You Are Not a Parrot And a chatbot is not a human. And a linguist named Emily M. Bender is very worried what will happen when we forget this.

I've been thinking a lot recently about how once LLMs hit the scene I stopped seeing "content farming" everywhere and started seeing ChatGPT everywhere, and how I'm now not sure as I'm wading through the dreck that Google returns if it's humans or compute polluting the infosphere.

And how the corollary to this is that quite a bit of humanity and human endeavor can be replaced by a couple of GPUs stuffed into a computer, and how our bar for "intelligent" is actually pretty low.

I'm still pondering those thoughts, and now I need to go back and really read Bender's Climbing towards NLU, because my history of interacting with humans means that the octopus thought experiment doesn't rule out an awful lot of human behavior, but lots of good stuff in this article.

[ related topics: Interactive Drama Invention and Design Artificial Intelligence Birds New York ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.