Flutterby™! : Angus Deaton Rethinking Economics

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Angus Deaton Rethinking Economics

2024-03-25 23:54:01.913936+01 by Dan Lyke 2 comments

If you've been reading Flutterby for 26 years now, you've seen my personal evolution from big-O Objectivist big-L Libertarian, to raving left wing statist kook pragmatist. It's happened a bit at a time, first was realizing that Rand's essay on patents and creating artificial scarcity laid bare that most Libertarians are Monarchists who aren't smart enough to realize it (I think something made horribly clear in the past several years). Somewhere in there was reading A Farewell To Alms[Wiki] and realizing the ways in which the conclusion of that book was flawed.

Anyway, a few years ago I ran across Donald MacKenzie's observation that the study of economics is an engine, not a camera (I haven't yet read his book), and that shattered a few more neurons loose, and last night I started reading Kate Raworth's Donut Economics, and it's good to see that a lot of younger economists are questioning the institution.

So, yeah, unsurprising that Nobel laureate economist Angus Deaton savages his own profession as clueless and unethical.

International Monetary Fund : Angus Deaton : Rethinking Economics

[ related topics: Interactive Drama Politics Objectivism Libertarian Books Photography History Writing Machinery Economics Books: A Farewell to Alms ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: Angus Deaton Rethinking Economics made: 2024-03-26 01:07:58.814166+01 by: spc476

I'd be wary of the "pragmatist" label---Kissenger was a pragmatist (realpolitik) and look where it got us.

#Comment Re: Angus Deaton Rethinking Economics made: 2024-03-26 21:54:52.201243+01 by: Dan Lyke

Yeah, there's that challenge of what the metrics are for pragmatism... But, especially as I read through Henry George's philosophical justifications for the land value tax, I think it's also important to say "we're doing this because we desire this outcome" rather than "we're doing this because it's the one true way".

Add your own comment:

(If anyone ever actually uses Webmention/indie-action to post here, please email me)




Format with:

(You should probably use "Text" mode: URLs will be mostly recognized and linked, _underscore quoted_ text is looked up in a glossary, _underscore quoted_ (http://xyz.pdq) becomes a link, without the link in the parenthesis it becomes a <cite> tag. All <cite>ed text will point to the Flutterby knowledge base. Two enters (ie: a blank line) gets you a new paragraph, special treatment for paragraphs that are manually indented or start with "#" (as in "#include" or "#!/usr/bin/perl"), "/* " or ">" (as in a quoted message) or look like lists, or within a paragraph you can use a number of HTML tags:

p, img, br, hr, a, sub, sup, tt, i, b, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, cite, em, strong, code, samp, kbd, pre, blockquote, address, ol, dl, ul, dt, dd, li, dir, menu, table, tr, td, th

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.

Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.