Flutterby™! : Supreme Court’s Contempt for Facts

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Supreme Court’s Contempt for Facts

2024-07-25 23:26:57.23073+02 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

Logging just because I feel like this is kind of a turn that I'll want to go back to: Scientific American: The Supreme Court’s Contempt for Facts Is a Betrayal of Justice

[ related topics: Law Enforcement ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: Supreme Court’s Contempt for Facts made: 2024-07-27 16:03:33.725098+02 by: Definitely Not a Bot

Shared this

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.