Flutterby™! : more "bogus AI-generated research" in the legal field

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

more "bogus AI-generated research" in the legal field

2025-05-15 18:40:35.54742+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Judge slams lawyers for ‘bogus AI-generated research’

A California judge slammed a pair of law firms for the undisclosed use of AI after he received a supplemental brief with “numerous false, inaccurate, and misleading legal citations and quotations.” In a ruling submitted last week, Judge Michael Wilner imposed $31,000 in sanctions against the law firms involved, saying “no reasonably competent attorney should out-source research and writing” to AI, as pointed out by law professors Eric Goldman and Blake Reid on Bluesky.

I mean, we've been seeing lawyers use made up citations and precedent for a while now, but it's twenty fucking twenty five, so clearly the punitive measures for lying and blaming it on computer haven't been harsh enough.

[ related topics: Writing Law Current Events California Culture Artificial Intelligence ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):