Flutterby™! : Stack Overflow rebranding

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Stack Overflow rebranding

2025-05-19 18:05:14.251835+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Stack Overflow seeks rebrand as traffic continues to plummet – which is bad news for developers

Andy Balaam @andybalaam@mastodon.social cast this as

Poorly-copied answers ripped off from stackoverflow and wrapped in a patronising tone are putting stackoverflow out of business.

Which isn't wrong, but the whole tone and gamification that Stack Overflow pushed led to ... yes, better in many cases than vendor documentation (looking at you, Apple, burying the important shit deep in videos), but snark and "answers" which aren't terribly useful and a general decline in the quality of coding information.

Via Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 @rysiek@mstdn.social who cast this as:

Somebody needs to set up a new StackOverflow, with no AI. Literally a golden opportunity.

[ related topics: Apple Computer Software Engineering Current Events ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.