Code completion gets it wrong
2025-07-29 17:17:14.6007+02 by
Dan Lyke
1 comments
Ars Technica: Two major AI coding tools wiped out user data after making cascading mistakes — "I have failed you completely and catastrophically," wrote Gemini.. I was gonna get completely up in arms over that anthorpomorphization, but the author gets it:
It's worth noting that AI models cannot assess their own capabilities. This is because they lack introspection into their training, surrounding system architecture, or performance boundaries. They often provide responses about what they can or cannot do as confabulations based on training patterns rather than genuine self-knowledge, leading to situations where they confidently claim impossibility for tasks they can actually perform—or conversely, claim competence in areas where they fail.
If there are positive things that come out of the mass delusion that is AI, backups and version control are gonna be two of them...
[ related topics:
Interactive Drama Software Engineering Theater & Plays Artificial Intelligence Architecture
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: Code completion gets it wrong made: 2025-07-29 21:50:15.076844+02 by:
spc476
Version control will not help if one is doing pure vibe coding (not caring about the code, etc.). Do you check in the C sludge that lex outputs, or the lex code itself? If you are pure vibe coding, the prompts are the source code, not the generated code.
AI bros can be irrational longer than you can remain sane …
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.