Salon subscription
2001-03-21 00:20:23+01 by
Dan Lyke
2 comments
Salon introduces a subscription service. Interesting bit: 'Premium subscribers will be able to view Salon without banner or "pop-up" ads.' Translation: They're making less than $30/year/subscriber from ads. Given that in the economics of the dead-trees world subscriptions are a way to verify interest for the advertisers, this means that the 'net has not yet happened.
[ related topics:
Web development
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment made: 2002-02-21 06:31:22+01 by:
TC
Hmmm, I'd have to say they seem to have grip on today's reality. I get a lot from salon so I think I'm gonna support them. I certainly get as much from them as any of the the 7 dead tree mags I pay for. Two things of note in these changing times.
#1 Salon smacked Slate(pay to view) in the first round of online mags.
#2 Industry Standary (dead wood publication) has now offered me a free subscription to keep their circulation numbers up.
#Comment made: 2002-02-21 06:31:22+01 by:
petronius
The problem with "free subscriptions" are that independent audits show that the recipient does not pay for them. If I were buying advertising space I would prefer a paid publication: If I have to lay out my own money I would expect to read the mag to get my money's worth! I tend to glance over freebies and toss them.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.