Flutterby™! : death-row follies

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

death-row follies

2003-02-12 15:55:47+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

radio free beowulf had a link to an article about a Missouri death penalty conviction being upheld strictly on process grounds. It was a jail murder, a guard testified he saw another man running running away from the scene, but three inmates testified they saw the convicted. The three inmates have later recanted, but by this time the case is up to the State Supreme Court, and the prosecutor is arguing that innocence is irrelevant, process is what matters:

"So you would put an innocent man to death as long as he got a fair trial," Judge Ronnie White said.

Jung replied that the remedy in such a case is the governor, who has the power to pardon. The Supreme Court, however, has adopted the proposition that innocence should be considered only if a constitutional violation has occurred, he said.

[ related topics: Law Current Events Race ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.