Flutterby™! : Constitutionality of Fuck

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Constitutionality of Fuck

2003-07-30 18:05:09.350992+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Via Daze Reader: I agree with The Smoking Gun, even in the face of Lawrence v. Texas[Wiki] this may be the legal document of the year: Motion to Dismiss: The Constitiutionality of Fuck, "Fucker", and "Fucking Fag". Written by a public defender to get the case of a student who used those epithets against his principal and was charged with disorderly conduct dismissed.

[ related topics: Language Sexual Culture Law ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.