Flutterby™! : Pastors 'n' porno

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Pastors 'n' porno

2004-02-12 22:36:09.788105+00 by Dan Lyke 6 comments

You've probably seen that a Dallas based group is buying anti-porn ads on billboards for Valentines Day. What struck me, though, is this paragraph:

Almost 18 percent of people who called themselves born-again Christians admitted visiting Internet porn sites, according to a 2000 survey of 1,031 adults by the evangelical group Focus on the Family. In a 2002 Pastors.com survey, more than 50 percent of responding pastors reported viewing pornography in the previous year.

Obviously it's not a scientific sample, but "50 percent of responding pastors"? Can we assume that they felt ashamed of doing so? If so, how healthy can a group of people who feel that much shame over something so close to their being be?

[ related topics: Religion Sexual Culture Sociology Current Events ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2004-02-12 22:53:36.723398+00 by: ziffle

"50 percent of responding pastors"? -- uuuhh its just research for Sundays, don't you know.

#Comment Re: made: 2004-02-12 23:20:50.63527+00 by: dws

The other 50 percent didn't watch the Super Bowl.

#Comment Re: made: 2004-02-12 23:36:43.836393+00 by: shmuel

If so, how healthy can a group of people who feel that much shame over something so close to their being be?

(emphasis added)

How much and how close? Seems to me that there are a couple of sweeping unfounded assumptions here...

#Comment Re: made: 2004-02-13 00:00:42.415581+00 by: Dan Lyke

Whence my "if so".

#Comment Re: made: 2004-02-13 11:39:54.182588+00 by: meuon

I'm not sure if I should be upset becuase 50% did NOT visit (or admit to it), or because 50% did. And for the record, I do not intentionally go to porn sites..

Dan, does Flutterby have a polling feature?

#Comment Re: made: 2004-02-19 16:59:21.571885+00 by: Dan Lyke

No polling feature yet... I've ignored it 'cause I'm not quite sure what such a poll would prove.