Flutterby™! : closed source voting: bad

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

closed source voting: bad

2005-09-16 16:57:05.791051+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

In the "told you so" department: US-CERT Cyber Security Bulletin SB04-252:

Diebold



GEMS Central Tabulator 1.17.7, 1.18
A vulnerability exists due to an undocumented backdoor account, which could a local or remote authenticated malicious user modify votes.



No workaround or patch available at time of publishing.



We are not aware of any exploits for this vulnerability.
GEMS Central Tabulator Vote Database Vote ModificationMediumBlackBoxVoting.org,

August 31, 2004

Those who've had dealings with CERT will understand my reluctance to believe that that last statement means anything at all.

Open source and paper trails, kids!

[ related topics: Free Software Politics security ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.