Flutterby™! : Mulling Miller

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Mulling Miller

2005-10-06 18:42:55.753897+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Jon Carroll asks some good questions about the Judith Miller situation:

So now here's the really odd part -- Libby's lawyer said that Miller had received an "explicit waiver" from Libby about a year ago, saying that it was OK to testify. Miller says that she did not hear it from Libby directly but only from his lawyer.

Did she think his lawyer was lying? And if so, why didn't she pick up the phone and just ask Libby what the deal was? Alternatively, why didn't Libby, when he realized that Miller was going to protect him, pick up a phone and call her? Or send a message with John Bolton? What changed between waiver A and waiver B? All the explanations offered by Miller and her defenders at the Times just don't make sense.

[ related topics: Interactive Drama Law Beer ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.