Mulling Miller
2005-10-06 18:42:55.753897+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments
Jon Carroll asks some good questions about the Judith Miller situation:
So now here's the really odd part -- Libby's lawyer said that Miller had received an "explicit waiver" from Libby about a year ago, saying that it was OK to testify. Miller says that she did not hear it from Libby directly but only from his lawyer.
Did she think his lawyer was lying? And if so, why didn't she pick up the phone and just ask Libby what the deal was? Alternatively, why didn't Libby, when he realized that Miller was going to protect him, pick up a phone and call her? Or send a message with John Bolton? What changed between waiver A and waiver B? All the explanations offered by Miller and her defenders at the Times just don't make sense.