Flutterby™! : Quid Est Veritas?

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Quid Est Veritas?

2006-04-17 22:52:43.444878+02 by petronius 0 comments

Arnold Kling, a Cato Institute libertarian, has an interesting piece in Tech Central Station on being a jury member in a 2nd degree murder case. I've never been on jury, but his description of the intersection of legal verbiage, juror psychology, and the difficulty of knowing what is really true seems pretty sound. Standing above it all is the widespread desire to be fair and just, which is not always the same thing. As he points out, there are problems with the jury system. However, having flawed humans judged by flawed jurors is probably the best way we have, and maybe the best hope for that defendant.

[ related topics: Libertarian Psychology, Psychiatry and Personality Law ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.