Flutterby™! : Partner(s)

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Partner(s)

2006-04-27 02:11:13.926874+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Yesterday, Charlene suggested a movie. Still sleep deprived from the trip, I said "sure, get whatever looks good". Charlene likes courtroom dramas, thrillers with twists, that sort of thing. I like silly romantic comedies. We both like movies that look at the non-mainstream. She came home with Partner(s), a movie which manages to incorporate all three.

Jonathan is a lawyer at a large firm. Katherine is his arch rival. In the inciting incident, they're told that there's only room for one more partner from their division this year, and it's fairly clear that even if they're fairly well matched lawyer-skills wise, Katherine has the edge because she's a woman. But there's a twist, a major client dealing with a big work discrimination lawsuit involving discrimination based on sexual preference asks specifically for Jonathan because he thinks Jonathan is gay. Jonathan is sweet on said client's daughter. Hijinks ensue.

It's not a great movie, the dialogue could have been tightened, I found myself distracted during the first half, and I think many story points could have been nicely tightened up. Despite the flaws in the story, however, the characters were endearing, and where it could have descended into trite parody of gay culture clichés instead it focused on the straight world's reaction. And the two emphatically "not gay" assistants got more than a few laugh-out-loud reactions from us.

Predictable, a little slow, could have used some story tightening, but worked pretty well. And nicely scratched both Charlene's "lawyers and intrigue" itch while fulfilling my romantic comedy desires.

[ related topics: Sexual Culture Movies Sociology Law ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.