Flutterby™! : Coverity

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Coverity

2006-12-07 01:45:07.371086+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

We just tried a sample run of Coverity on our code base, and I'm moderately impressed. My first reaction is "and GCC isn't finding these? do we have our warnings turned up high enough?".

But overall my feeling is a lot like when I finally got over my ego and embraced lint[Wiki], working with this tool for a few months would do good things for my C++ style, applying this tool to an existing code base is a very good thing, and I'm guessing that subjecting a programming team to a few months of it will make us all better programmers.

It ain't cheap, especially for a startup on a budget, but if you're managing a C++ code base it's worth looking at.

[ related topics: Software Engineering Work, productivity and environment ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.