PageRank
2011-08-17 22:57:52.893411+02 by
Dan Lyke
4 comments
I am not happy with Google's new page rank algorithms. Not just because Flutterby.com has
dropped from a 5 to a 4, but because I'm having more trouble now finding the actual event
venue web site (Main Stage West) amongst all
the ticket sellers and calendar aggregators, struggling to find the details from the
cooking blogs amidst the flawed recipe spammers like Food.com and Cooks.com and the Food
Network.
[ related topics:
broadband Invention and Design Food
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2011-08-18 13:47:40.996702+02 by:
andylyke
Good. I thought it was just me. For the past few weeks, I've found Google to be next to useless. Every apparently useful link becomes simply some other kind of (pseudo?) search engine.
#Comment Re: made: 2011-08-18 15:01:27.019327+02 by:
meuon
[edit history]
I'm wondering if they aren't linking to people that feed their ads in bulk as a ranking mechanism. ie: If we pay them XXXX for their ads, they must have a good website and reference for these words.
#Comment Re: made: 2011-08-18 17:15:56.367325+02 by:
Dan Lyke
Woah, just did my search on Bing, got the results I wanted... Might be a tipping point.
#Comment Re: made: 2011-08-19 10:23:18.152306+02 by:
DaveP
And here I thought my google-fu was just "under the weather."
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.